responsible credit
HOME   IMPRINT - ECRC   PRIVACY POLICY   SITEMAP   | ECRC IN THE MEDIA |
Search OK

 
Home
ANTI-USURY: The coalition has promoted discussions on the issues of interest rate ceilings for many years. A desire by 100+ US community leaders to see rates capped at 36%, not only shows that usury has become a concern in the USA but that they are not the antithesis of the free market as some people think.
100 + DIVERSE NATIONAL AND STATE GROUPS SUPPORT DURBIN’S S. 500 BILL
March 2, 2009


Dear Senator Durbin:

We applaud you for introducing S.500 that would stop a wide range of lending
abuses by capping interest rates for consumer credit at 36 percent annually. Cleaning up
the finance industry is essential to a sustainable economic recovery.

The “Protecting Consumers from Unreasonable Credit Rates Act” would
implement a key promise made by President Obama to extend to all Americans
Congressional protection against predatory lending for Service members and their
families. By limiting the total cost of consumer credit to 36 percent, Congress will keep
billions of dollars in the hands of low and moderate-income consumers, helping to
stimulate the economy without costing taxpayers a penny.

This measure is designed to keep affordable financial products available, as
lenders who offer sustainable loans do so at rates well below 36 percent annually. But it
would eliminate abuses that rely on high fees, interest and other devices to charge
extremely high annual rates—some 400 percent and higher—to trap consumers in debt
they cannot afford to pay off.

Protections that once curbed abusive lending in America have been shredded, and
consumers are paying astronomical rates for credit, especially those who have the fewest
resources. Payday loans cost 400 percent APR or higher; car title loans cost 300 percent
APR and put car ownership at risk; loans secured by expected tax refunds cost 50 to 500
percent APR; and credit card fees and interest can combine to produce triple-digit rates.
Bank overdraft loans can cost quadruple digit interest rates. These extremely expensive
credit products drain billions from families who struggle to make ends meet, diminishing
their ability to purchase products and services that would boost the economy.

The ability of states to enact meaningful reforms on credit card and bank
overdraft practices has been severely restricted as a result of federal preemption. Banks
are now permitted to locate in a state without consumer protections and then engage in
unregulated lending in the other forty-nine states, which are powerless to protect their
citizens against high cost credit cards and tax refund anticipation loans. State usury caps
have been riddled with loopholes and exceptions, leaving consumers in thirty-five states
exposed to outrageously expensive payday loans.

The FAIR (Fees and Interest Rate) cap on consumer credit is set high enough not
to hamper mainstream responsible lending. A 36 percent rate cap is twice the limit for
federally-chartered credit unions and enables credit to be responsibly extended to
consumers with less than perfect credit ratings. This is the rate cap enacted by Congress
through the Military Lending Act and is the limit typically used in state small loan laws.
The FAIR cap will be the maximum amount lenders can charge, but states will be able to
set lower rate caps to protect their citizens, such as New York’s 25 percent criminal cap
and Arkansas’s constitutional cap.

We urge quick action to implement the FAIR cap to stop usurious credit rates, to
protect struggling consumers, and to put all lenders under the same set of protections.

(see the link below to find details of the supporters of this US anti-usury bill).

ID: 42839
Author(s): ECRC
Publication date: 07/05/09
   
URL(s):

Supporters of Senator Durbin's interest rate caps in the US (March 2009)

Link to "Usury" section of the website
 

Created: 08/05/09. Last changed: 08/05/09.
Information concerning property and copy right of the content will be given by the Institut For Financial Services (IFF) on demand. A lack of explicit information on this web site does not imply any right for free usage of any content.